On April 3, 2025, the Lok Sabha passed the Waqf Amendment Bill 2025 after a grueling 14-hour debate, with 288 votes in favor and 232 against. Now rebranded as the Unified Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency, and Development (UMEED) Bill, this legislation overhauls the Waqf Act of 1995, which governs properties donated by Muslims for religious and charitable purposes. While the government claims it’s a move toward transparency, opposition leaders, Muslim organizations, and community voices decry it as a blatant assault on Muslim religious rights and a violation of India’s constitutional promises. As the bill heads to the Rajya Sabha, it’s igniting a firestorm of resistance—and for good reason.
This isn’t just a policy tweak; it’s a seismic shift that threatens the heart of Muslim autonomy in India. Critics warn that the Waqf Amendment Bill 2025 could dismantle centuries of religious tradition, undermine community welfare, and set a dangerous precedent for state overreach into minority affairs.
A Direct Attack on Constitutional Protections
The Waqf Amendment Bill 2025 is being slammed as a frontal attack on India’s constitutional framework, particularly the rights to equality, religious freedom, and self-governance enshrined in Articles 14, 25, 26, and 29. Opponents argue that it tramples on the Muslim community’s fundamental right to manage its own religious institutions by imposing unprecedented government control over waqf properties. The inclusion of non-Muslim members on waqf boards is seen as a particularly egregious overstep, stripping Muslims of their ability to oversee their sacred endowments without outside interference.
Even more alarming is the removal of the “Waqf by user” provision, a safeguard that protected properties used for religious purposes over generations, even without formal paperwork. This change leaves historic mosques and other cherished sites vulnerable to reclassification or seizure, threatening the very fabric of Muslim heritage in India.
Muslim Religious Rights in Jeopardy
The bill’s structural changes are a recipe for systemic discrimination, critics say. By transferring authority from specialized waqf tribunals to district collectors and government officials, it hands the fate of Muslim properties to bureaucrats who may lack expertise in Islamic law—or worse, harbor political biases. This shift risks turning waqf disputes into a tool for settling scores, especially in areas where religious tensions already simmer.
The mandate for non-Muslim representation in waqf councils and boards is another blow to Muslim religious rights. Opponents argue that it’s absurd to expect outsiders to grasp the intricacies of Islamic endowments, let alone make decisions about them. This isn’t reform—it’s a dilution of community control, plain and simple, and a violation of the constitutional promise that minorities can govern their own affairs.
Devastating Fallout for Communities and Heritage
The Waqf Amendment Bill 2025 doesn’t just threaten governance—it endangers the Muslim community’s lifeline of charitable works. Waqf properties have long fueled schools, clinics, orphanages, and aid for the poor. By disrupting their administration, the bill could choke these efforts, leaving the most vulnerable to suffer. Imagine the ripple effect: education stalled, healthcare shuttered, and families abandoned—all because of a law cloaked as “efficiency.”
Then there’s the cultural cost. Without “Waqf by user,” countless historical mosques and worship sites—some standing for centuries—could be lost to legal limbo or government claims. This isn’t just about property; it’s about erasing a legacy that defines Muslim identity in India.
Government Claims Ring Hollow
The government insists the Waqf Amendment Bill 2025 is about curbing corruption and boosting transparency, not meddling in religion. But opposition leaders and Muslim voices aren’t buying it. They point to a glaring double standard: why target waqf properties when endowments of other faiths escape similar scrutiny? The bill’s provisions—like allowing non-Muslim majorities on waqf boards—look less like reform and more like a calculated move to marginalize Muslims while leaving Hindu or Sikh institutions untouched.
Critics also scoff at the idea that handing power to bureaucrats fixes mismanagement. If anything, it invites delays, legal tangles, and arbitrary rulings—hardly a win for efficiency. The government’s defense feels like a flimsy cover for a deeper agenda, one that opposition parties say is about dividing communities for political gain.
A United Front Against Injustice
The opposition is rallying hard against this bill—and rightly so. Leaders from Congress, TMC, Samajwadi Party, and AIMIM have called it unconstitutional, discriminatory, and a betrayal of India’s pluralistic spirit. They warn that it’s not just Muslims at risk; it’s a precedent that could one day target other minorities. This is a fight for justice, for the right to worship and give freely, and for a nation that honors its diversity rather than tearing it apart.
As the Waqf Amendment Bill 2025 heads to the Rajya Sabha, the opposition’s message is clear: this isn’t reform—it’s repression. The Muslim community, backed by a chorus of allies, is ready to resist a law that threatens their faith, their heritage, and their future.
Sources: